Skip to content

Some DPUB roles are too generic (such as "part") #39

Closed
Closed
Some DPUB roles are too generic (such as "part")#39

Description

@cookiecrook
cookiecrook
opened on Apr 22, 2015

Several of the roles are too generic. "part" for example.

From 9 March 2015:
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pfwg/2015Mar/0021.html

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Fields

    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions