-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15.3k
RFC 2203 does not work for Vec::new #65737
Copy link
Copy link
Closed
Labels
A-const-evalArea: Constant evaluation, covers all const contexts (static, const fn, ...)Area: Constant evaluation, covers all const contexts (static, const fn, ...)B-unstableBlocker: Implemented in the nightly compiler and unstable.Blocker: Implemented in the nightly compiler and unstable.C-bugCategory: This is a bug.Category: This is a bug.T-compilerRelevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.requires-nightlyThis issue requires a nightly compiler in some way. When possible, use a F-* label instead.This issue requires a nightly compiler in some way. When possible, use a F-* label instead.
Description
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
A-const-evalArea: Constant evaluation, covers all const contexts (static, const fn, ...)Area: Constant evaluation, covers all const contexts (static, const fn, ...)B-unstableBlocker: Implemented in the nightly compiler and unstable.Blocker: Implemented in the nightly compiler and unstable.C-bugCategory: This is a bug.Category: This is a bug.T-compilerRelevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.requires-nightlyThis issue requires a nightly compiler in some way. When possible, use a F-* label instead.This issue requires a nightly compiler in some way. When possible, use a F-* label instead.
RFC 2203 specifically calls out
Vec::newas a motivating example, however this does not work on the current nightly.There are two reasons for this. First, promotion in array repeat expressions currently uses the "implicit" rules for promotability, which forbids promotion of function calls without
#[rustc_promotable]. Second, the result ofVec::new()is marked asNeedsDropsinceVec<T>isDrop, which disqualifies it from promotion, even in an explicit context.cc #49147