| By Orlando Scott-Cowley | Article Rating: |
|
| August 23, 2011 12:30 PM EDT | Reads: |
707 |
Migrating to the cloud at the moment? Or at least planning to sometime soon? Lots of businesses are either moving key IT services out to the cloud right now, or are planning to in the near future. Many organizations have adopted the "Cloud First' ethos, of procuring cloud solutions for new platforms, rather than on premise.
Most IT departments I talk to have a solid plan for these migrations, a plan that's been well thought out and even tested; but I think it's fair to say some don't. The latter is usually found when a C-level manager has dictated the use of a cloud solution in a "get it done and don't bother me with the details" type of management style. Very 1997 I know - I thought those days were over, Mr Gekko?
IT departments are unlikely to declare IT bankruptcy and ship everything out to the cloud over the next long holiday weekend, even if there is pressure from the C suite to get ‘cloud first' apps in place as quickly as possible. Migrating systems to the cloud needs careful planning and consideration, not just the move itself but an understanding of the data, processes, policies, APIs, people, and supporting platforms involved. In other words - the details.

Take a move to the latest version of Microsoft Exchange, for example. Of course I mean Office 365, but many businesses are still thinking about how best to get to Exchange 2010; you see they're still lingering on their trusty Exchange 2003 infrastructure. We have spoken before about the complexity of the peripheral applications that surround the Exchange Server being a hindrance to a migration project, and how dealing with this complexity makes you and your business ‘Migration Ready'. Most of the careful planning and consideration has to take into account all those peripheral applications and services first, extending the scope of the project into, perhaps, much more than was originally considered. Hardly surprising we lose track of the details and start to focus on the final outcome.
Let's stick with Microsoft Exchange as an example: How about this as an alternative strategy to get your business to the cloud. At Mimecast we often talk about a strategy called "Just Enough on Site," which is about finding the balance between on-site and cloud. You're augmenting your network with cloud. Exchange 2010 is an on-ramp to Office 365 Exchange Online - what do I mean by that? Well, rather than try to move everything and everyone to Office 365 Exchange Online now, simply take your time. The Exchange 2010 migration should be a focused move to a platform that will allow you to introduce the cloud into your business in small well-planned steps.
Jumping into standing up cloud instances all over the place might work, but it's far better to take your time to sweat the details for a while, and think about how you introduce the cloud to the network over a number of smaller migrations rather than one great big one.
As they say round here - "Let the network see the cloud."
Published August 23, 2011 Reads 707
Copyright © 2011 Ulitzer, Inc. — All Rights Reserved.
Syndicated stories and blog feeds, all rights reserved by the author.
More Stories By Orlando Scott-Cowley
Orlando Scott-Cowley is a Mimecast Technologist and Evangelist. Prior to joining Mimecast in 2006, he has worked in the IT Security industry for his entire career, working with governments, businesses, vendors, resellers and in consultancy. Orlando's evangelism for Mimecast includes writing and speaking for influential publications and events on a variety of topics from Compliance, Archiving, Security and Continuity; in particular the emergence of Cloud and SaaS technologies.
- Has Cloud Changed Enterprise IT?
- Gluster Offers OpenStack Swift-Alternative Storage
- Five Reasons for WAN Optimization in the Cloud
- MapR to Challenge Cloudera over Hadoop
- Follow YOUR Path to Cloud Computing
- Cloud Computing Reference Architectures, Models and Frameworks
- The Difference Between Public and Private Cloud Computing
- Can the Cloud Tsunami Continue Forever?
- A Better Path Toward Legacy Integration with the Cloud
- Four Steps to Compliance Management in the Public Cloud
- LSI Corporation to Exhibit at Cloud Expo 2011 Silicon Valley
- Linux Labs Completed Development for HPC Cloud Computing Service
- Newly Appointed GoGrid Exec Chairman to Present at Cloud Expo 2011 New York
- On-Premise Private Clouds: Effective On-Ramp to Cloud Computing Adoption
- Virtualization – The Engine that Enables Cloud Computing
- The Next Big Thing for Cloud Computing
- TIBCO Extends Messaging Portfolio Using HTML WebSocket
- Take the Concept of the Internet to the Next Level with Cloud Computing
- The Next Big Conquests in Cloud Computing
- Has Cloud Changed Enterprise IT?
- Cloud Expo New York: Developing Enterprise Applications in the Cloud
- Gluster Offers OpenStack Swift-Alternative Storage
- Moving to the Cloud – Benefits and Concerns
- Quest Software Named “Silver Sponsor” of Cloud Expo 2011 Silicon Valley
- Cloud Expo 2011 East To Attract 10,000 Delegates and 200 Exhibitors
- Cloud Expo, Inc. Announces Cloud Expo 2011 New York Venue
- Top Two Technology Priorities for CIOs in 2011: Cloud & Virtualization
- The Advantages of Using Cloud Computing
- Newly Appointed GoGrid Exec Chairman to Present at Cloud Expo 2011 New York
- SMB Cloud Is A Hacker's Paradise
- Leading Cloud CxO's Join Speaker Faculty of Cloud Expo New York
- CA Technologies’ Gregor Petri to Present at Cloud Expo 2011 New York
- Cloud Databases for Dummies
- 5GL PaaS
- Cloud at the Height of Inflated Expectations: Gartner
- NoSQL – The Trend for Databases in the Cloud?


































Ulitzer content is offered under Creative Commons "Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives" License.
For any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms of this work.
The best way to do this is with a link to this web page.
Any of the above conditions can be waived if you get written permission from Ulitzer, Inc., the copyright holder.
Nothing in this license impairs or restricts the author's moral rights.