| By Maureen O'Gara | Article Rating: |
|
| August 10, 2011 07:00 AM EDT | Reads: |
788 |
District Court Judge William Alsup told Google Monday that it can't come in at this late date - after facts discovery has pretty much closed - with what he called an "entire fleet" of additional claims that Oracle's Java patents are invalid.
Oracle was ordered to winnow its beloved 132 claims down to 50 by June 1. Google was supposed to take its best shot at them by June 15.
The judge didn't much care how long Google dithered around saying it "suggests a lack of diligence."
"It is possible," he wrote, "that Google simply did not have that many good invalidity theories and is now trying to fill in with whatever it can belatedly cobble together."

Not only that but "Google's decision to wait until after Oracle was locked into its patent-claim selections to fortify its invalidity case with ‘defenses that it has now determined are among its strongest' amounts to sandbagging," he said.
Patent watcher Florian Mueller said a while back this was what Google was up to and now Google's stuck with its first take.
The details are at http://fosspatents.blogspot.com/2011/08/judge-does-not-allow-google-to.html.
Published August 10, 2011 Reads 788
Copyright © 2011 Ulitzer, Inc. — All Rights Reserved.
Syndicated stories and blog feeds, all rights reserved by the author.
More Stories By Maureen O'Gara
Maureen O'Gara the most read technology reporter for the past 20 years, is the Cloud Computing and Virtualization News Desk editor of SYS-CON Media. She is the publisher of famous "Billygrams" and the editor-in-chief of "Client/Server News" for more than a decade. One of the most respected technology reporters in the business, Maureen can be reached by email at maureen(at)sys-con.com or paperboy(at)g2news.com, and by phone at 516 759-7025. Twitter: @MaureenOGara
- The History of Programming
- Sun Burns Oracle
- It's the Java vs. C++ Shootout Revisited!
- Oracle Wants Billions from Google Suit
- Developers Should Learn Why, Not Just Memorize What
- Valve, JAAS and Filter in Tomcat
- ActiveJDBC: New Java ORM
- Oracle Wants $2.6 Billion in Damages from Google
- How Bad Outdated JavaScript Libraries Are for Page Load Time
- Why Response Times Are Often Measured Incorrectly
- IBM CEO Seeks Heir
- Oracle Wants $1.4B-$6.1B from Google for Java Infringement
- Cloud Economics – Amazon, Microsoft, Google Compared
- Driving Java Innovation in the Cloud at Cloud Expo 2011 New York
- The History of Programming
- How Garbage Collection Differs in the Three Big JVMs
- Thirty Tips to Optimize HTML/CSS/Images for Smooth Web Experience
- Sun Burns Oracle
- It's the Java vs. C++ Shootout Revisited!
- OSGi Application Testing with Tycho
- Sun Settles Eolas’ Java Claims
- Oracle Wants Billions from Google Suit
- Developers Should Learn Why, Not Just Memorize What
- Three Tips to Successfully Load Test Adobe Flex Applications
- Secrets Of The Masters: Core Java Job Interview Questions
- A Cup of AJAX? Nay, Just Regular Java Please
- SYS-CON Announces Readers' Choice Awards for SOA, Java, Linux, .NET, MX, ColdFusion, and XML Technologies
- Java Developer's Journal Exclusive: 2006 "JDJ Editors' Choice" Awards
- Rich Internet Applications with Adobe Flex 2 and Java
- Java vs C++ "Shootout" Revisited
- Reporting Made Easy with JasperReports and Hibernate
- Why Do 'Cool Kids' Choose Ruby or PHP to Build Websites Instead of Java?
- What's New in Eclipse?
- How and Why AJAX, Not Java, Became the Favored Technology for Rich Internet Applications
- Java Basics: Lesson 11, Java Packages and Imports (Live Video Education)
- Cover Story: What Is POJO Programming?
































Ulitzer content is offered under Creative Commons "Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives" License.
For any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms of this work.
The best way to do this is with a link to this web page.
Any of the above conditions can be waived if you get written permission from Ulitzer, Inc., the copyright holder.
Nothing in this license impairs or restricts the author's moral rights.